The Dalcroze approach to music
education was
developed in Switzerland in the early twentieth century by Emile
Jaques-Dalcroze. While the approach was initially intended
for
conservatory students, Dalcroze Eurhythmics soon expanded to the
training of musicians, dancers, and actors of all ages, as well as to
therapeutic applications. (for background, see pp. 4-6).
Philosophy
The Dalcroze philosophy centers on the concept that the synthesis of
the mind, body, and resulting emotions is fundamental to all meaningful
learning. Plato said in his Laws: “Education has two branches,
one of gymnastics, which is concerned with the body, and the other of
music, which is designed for the improvement of the soul”
(Pennington, 1925, p. 9). Emile Jaques-Dalcroze believed that every
musician should strive to be sensitive and expressive, and to express
music through purposeful movement, sound, thought, feeling, and
creativity.
Mead (1994) cites four basic premises that encapsulate the Dalcroze
philosophy:
1.
Eurhythmics awakens the
physical, aural, and visual images of music in the mind.
2.
Solfège (sight-singing
and ear-training), improvisation, and eurhythmics together work to
improve expressive musicality and enhance intellectual understanding.
3. Music
may be experienced
through speech, gesture, and movement. These can likewise be
experienced in time, space, and energy.
4. Humans
learn best when
learning through multiple senses. Music should be taught through the
tactile, the kinesthetic, the aural, and the visual senses.
Jaques-Dalcroze wanted to create an approach to music education in
which sensory and intellectual experiences are fused into one
neuromuscular experience—reinforcing the body’s response to
music (Caldwell, 1995). He felt that this would lead to performance at
high levels, beyond expectation (Carder, 1990). He believed that music
education should center on active involvement in musical experience.
Technique and intellectual understanding are important, but active
experience must come first. Today’s music education is based on
the "sound before the symbol" philosophy, a legacy of Jaques-Dalcroze
and Pestalozzi before him. Jaques-Dalcroze felt that students could
practice and learn musical expression through the active discovery of
time, space, and energy. He believed that as music moves, so should
musicians; therefore, rhythm is elemental to this philosophy.
Jaques-Dalcroze taught that through rhythmic movement, musicians could
experience symmetry, form, tension and relaxation, phrasing, melody,
and harmony. Experience should teach the musical elements (Martin,
1965).
Jaques-Dalcroze intended for his approach to develop musical
understanding through eurhythmics and to help students develop
immediate physical responsiveness to rhythmic stimuli. Developing
muscular rhythms and nervous sensibility would ultimately lead to the
capacity to discriminate even slight gradations of duration, time,
intensity, and phrasing. Through rhythmic movement, students would
begin to think and express themselves more musically. Initially,
Jaques-Dalcroze’s conception of eurhythmics was designed for the
education of conservatory musicians but soon expanded to the early
musical education of children, and to those with special needs. His
philosophy grew to include his belief in the development of a more
musical society through rhythmic training in the schools (Campbell,
1991).
Components
The Dalcroze approach, often identified as Eurhythmics, consists of
three related components. The first is Rhythmic Solfège, or ear
training. Jaques-Dalcroze believed that students must learn
sophisticated listening skills and develop "inner hearing."
Musicians should be able to hear what they write and write what they
hear. Music notation is meaningless unless realized in real performance
or in the imagination. Solfège is taught using the fixed-do
approach, based on the French system. Students develop sensitivity to
pitches, their relation to each other, and to the tonal framework. What
makes Dalcroze solfège unique is that it is always combined with
rhythm and movement, both locomotor and nonlocomotor.
The second component of Dalcroze music education is improvisation.
Improvisation skills are developed sequentially and used in many ways.
An instructor may play the piano while students improvise movement,
react spontaneously to verbal instructions, or change in musical
character. In the reverse, a student might improvise movement while
another student accompanies with a drum, at the piano, or in song.
Students soon develop skills to be able to improvise musically and
expressively on their own instruments. These spontaneous performance
activities are designed to improve response time and communication
accuracy (Mead, 1994).
The third piece in the puzzle is the eurhythmics itself. Often
considered the core of the Dalcroze approach, eurhythmics was actually
the last part to be developed. It is of equal importance with rhythmic
solfège and improvisation, but not more. The term eurhythmics is
from the Greek "eu," meaning good, and "rhythmy," meaning rhythm,
proportion, and symmetry. This idea embodies Dalcroze philosophy in two
ways. First, human beings can experience symmetry, balance, and
rhythmic accuracy in music through symmetry, balance, and rhythmic
accuracy in movement. Second, the three components of the Dalcroze
approach (rhythmic solfège, improvisation, and eurhythmics) are
interdependent and must be taught together. The three complement and
reinforce each other, providing a complete and balanced musical
education. Modern music educators and music therapists often identify
the approach as Eurhythmics, though all three facets are implied.
Lessons
A typical introductory Dalcroze lesson involves activities or games
that require total mental and kinesthetic awareness. The lesson is
presented in a somatic approach that allows the participant to hear and
react physically to the musical stimulus, which produces body awareness
and sensations. These physical sensations are transmitted back to the
brain as emotions and a more developed comprehension of the experience.
It is common to begin a Dalcroze lesson with walking to improvised
music and responding to changes in tempo, dynamics, and phrase in quick
reaction games. Through these activities, the students begin to
understand how physical adjustments, such as energy and flow of the
body weight, need to occur in order to “physicalize” the
music. Through these basic instructions, the teacher can address
musical elements such as pulse, beat, subdivision, meter, rhythm,
phrase, and form.
Intermediate Dalcroze lessons can address polymeters, polyrhythms,
canon, tension and relaxation, breathing, conducting, counterpoint, and
the interactions of anacrusis, crusis, and metacrusis. Creativity is
pervasive throughout the lesson. All classes are in a group setting
where the participants interact with partners or small groups to
develop the nonverbal communication skills and creativity necessary in
music and movement.
Plastique Animée, or more often referred to as plastique, is the
culminating experience in a Dalcroze class. A plastique combines the
skills addressed throughout the class, and from previous rhythmic
experiences, into a loosely based choreography that is both physically
expressive and musical. The students are provided with the basics of
the requirements and are asked to spontaneously create an interactive
composition with the music. Someone who is stepping into a Dalcroze
studio at that moment would see music in motion and might not be aware
that the movement is spontaneous.
Dalcroze in Today’s
Classrooms
Modern music education benefits from Jaques-Dalcroze's teaching in many
ways. Today's teachers focus on active learning on the part of the
students. This implies less instruction and more experience for the
students (Caldwell, 1993). Dalcroze philosophy also places emphasis on
musical behavior and expression, and their demonstration through
observable movement. Visible evidence of musical understanding through
experience takes some of the mystery out of the verbal definitions of
musicality.
Another aspect of modern music education inherited from Jaques-Dalcroze
is the celebration of the individual. Teachers expect to provide
appropriate musical experiences for all their students. Creativity and
imaginary play are encouraged through improvisation. Music class is
student oriented, with groups of students actively thinking about,
listening to, and analyzing and creating music (Johnson, 1993).
Jaques-Dalcroze placed special emphasis on child-centered learning. He
developed a particular interest in the natural development of the child
(Johnson, 1993). Across ages, Jaques-Dalcroze developed music teaching
strategies that were age and ability-level appropriate. His approach to
music learning was broken down into experiences for the primary grades,
intermediate grades, and upper grades (Mead, 1994).
Dalcroze exercises and pedagogical principles are easy to apply to most
teaching situations (Johnson, 1993). Multiage classrooms are becoming
popular; Dalcroze exercises can be adapted to suit a variety of student
skill and experience levels. Dalcroze teacher training allows
instructors to become creative and flexible in the give-and-take of
modern education. The ability to be spontaneous in the classroom is
valuable for all educators. Teachers can follow through unexpected
teaching opportunities with ease, and provide students with a model of
an adaptable and creative personality.
Today, Dalcroze Eurhythmics is taught in music preparatory schools and
is part of the music theory and aural skills curriculum in
conservatories and universities throughout North America, Europe, Asia
and Australia. It also is used in K-12 music education, studio
teaching, dance education, and therapeutic situation. Training in the
approach is available in the United States and in Europe. In addition,
national and international professional organizations exist to support
eurhythmics teachers and those interested in pursuing the experience.
The Dalcroze Society of America posts the locations of training sites
in the United States. www.dalcrozeusa.org
Jaques-Dalcroze believed the learning process involved direct sensory
experience. He advocated kinesthetic learning. Through movement,
learning comes through experience in addition to observation. Varied
musical experiences—including movement, singing, improvisation,
music reading and writing, and playing instruments—reinforce
musical learning (Johnson, 1993). Moreover, Jaques-Dalcroze
believed that the way to health was through a balance of mind, body,
and senses. Many people have discovered that they can improve and
refine skills by rehearsing a combination of movements, first in the
real body and then imagining going through these movements with special
fluidity in the kinesthetic body. One can then return the same movement
in the real body, allowing the improved flow of kinesthetic rehearsal
to carry over into actual movement (Abramson, 1980).
Background
Émile-Henri Jaques was born into a musical home on July 6, 1865.
His Swiss parents were living in Vienna, and young Émile and his
sister Hélène were supported in their artistic education
by their mother Julie, herself a fine music teacher and pianist. She
had studied the philosophy and teaching methods of educational reformer
Heinrich Pestalozzi (1746-1827). He was an early advocate of teaching
through the senses and through experience, not merely through the
written word. He also supported the addition of vocal music instruction
to school curricula. Pestalozzi's influence on Madame Jaques was
evident in her son as well. Since the Dalcroze approach centers on the
philosophy that experience in music is key to musical understanding, it
seems that Pestalozzi and Dalcroze philosophies share common ground
(Collins, 1993). Childhood in the Jaques household was a time of
singing, playing, dancing, acting, and creating. Emile had a happy
childhood and was described as "lively, friendly, and even
contemplative for a child" (Spector, 1990, p. 5).
In 1875, the family moved to Geneva. After several years in a private
school, Émile Jaques enrolled at the Geneva Conservatory. At the
age of eighteen, he had not yet decided upon a career. The following
year, 1884, he went to Paris where he studied drama at the
Comédie Française and music at the Paris Conservatory.
Young Emile reveled in the artistic atmosphere of the city. A
passionate young actor and musician, he also found time to compose and
perform, singing as he accompanied himself on the piano.
While in Paris, Émile Jaques became familiar with the teachings
of Mathis Lussy (1828-1910), a piano instructor and writer. Lussy wrote
extensively on the subject of expressive musical performance and
musical understanding (Caldwell, 1995). Through Lussy, Émile
Jaques learned of the process of scholarly inquiry: to recognize
problems; to approach them scientifically; and to devise methods for
their solution (Spector, 1990). Émile Jaques’ interests
were shifting toward an emphasis in music, and after a visit with his
family in Geneva in the summer of 1886, he accepted the position of
assistant conductor and chorus master at the Théâtre des
Nouveaux in Algiers, North Africa. Algeria had been a French colony
since 1847, and consequently felt the influence of Western European
culture. Émile Jaques underwent two changes while enjoying his
first professional employment. Feeling that his youthful appearance
might inhibit his effectiveness as a leader, he began sporting the
mustache and goatee he would maintain for the rest of his life. This
was also the time when he added Dalcroze to his birth name Jaques. It
seems that a composer of polkas in Bordeaux, France, also had the name
Emile Jaques. To avoid confusion, Émile-Henri borrowed the name
Valcroze from a friend, changed the first letter to D, and was known
thereafter as Emile Jaques-Dalcroze (Spector, 1990).
After one season, Jaques-Dalcroze returned to Geneva in 1887 and, later
that year, moved to Vienna and enrolled at the Vienna Conservatory in
the studio of Anton Bruckner (1824-1927). Their collaboration was
brief: Bruckner insisted that "der dumme Franzose" study harmony from
the beginning, which Jaques-Dalcroze refused to do. Eventually Bruckner
attempted to have Jaques-Dalcroze thrown out of the conservatory, but
was thwarted by the faculty. Adolf Prosniz (1827-1917) invited
Jaques-Dalcroze into his studio. It may have been Prosniz who helped
Jaques-Dalcroze focus his musical concentration and learn to study
music with greater depth (Spector, 1990). In spite of his clashes with
Bruckner, Jaques-Dalcroze considered their association valuable.
Bruckner's intolerance and authoritative style were the antithesis of
Jaques-Dalcroze's loving, playful nature. Perhaps this experience
helped to solidify his idea that an effective teacher is one who
respects and educates the whole child.
Spring of 1889 brought Jaques-Dalcroze's return to the Paris
Conservatory and composition study with Gabriel Fauré. The
twenty-four-year-old musician made the most of his opportunities,
moving in the same musical circles as César Franck and other
artists of his stature. Jaques-Dalcroze continued to compose an
assortment of songs, ensembles, and sketches based on the customs of
the day.
In 1892, Jaques-Dalcroze returned to the Geneva Conservatory, this time
as a professor of solfège. He began to question the teaching
methods of the day and wonder what improvements he could make. Careful
observation of his students showed him that while the students could be
good musical technicians, they often did not hear or feel the nuances
of the music they were required to play. Just keeping a steady beat was
often difficult for the students. Jaques-Dalcroze began by getting the
students up from their seats keeping a steady beat by moving about the
space. From there he added other fundamental qualities of singing,
breathing, walking at various tempi, skipping, and conducting with
large gestures (Odom, 1998). He then added quality to the movement by
asking them to physically react to the improvised music that he was
providing at the piano. These qualities included legato, marcato, and
staccato movements to complement the music. Cooperative work with a
partner allowed the students to experience timing, space, strength and
weight, creativity, and cooperative learning. By adding rhythmic
movement to music, students acknowledged the body as the first
instrument of expression (Dutoit, 1971, p. 9). As instructor of
solfège, Jaques-Dalcroze believed that the compartmentalization
of music courses was detrimental to the pupils' true musical
development (Carder, 1990). By combining solfège with rhythmic
movement and improvisation into rhythmic gymnastics, as he first called
this work, Jaques-Dalcroze began to teach in a holistic style.
From 1903 to 1910, Jaques-Dalcroze actively pursued the development of
a teaching approach based on rhythmic gymnastics. However, his
colleagues at the Geneva Conservatory considered him something of a
radical. The disapproval that met his innovations was due partly to the
conservatory faculty's unwillingness to condone his experimental
techniques, and to have its students become "performing monkeys"
(Dutoit, 1971, p. 14). Another branch of resistance was from Genevan
society itself. Jaques-Dalcroze's students dressed in short-sleeved
tunics, with bare legs and feet, to allow free movement in class. This
was quite an affront to most Genevans, who lived according to the rigid
morality of the early twentieth century.
People outside of Geneva, however, were keen to adopt
Jaques-Dalcroze’s philosophy of music and movement education.
After a demonstration of his approach in Berlin, Jaques-Dalcroze
received an offer to develop an institution for rhythmic study at anhttp://www.real.com/?src=blackjack
experimental Garden City being designed north of Dresden, Germany. The
premise of Hellerau was to be a community that combined a planned
industrial settlement with a school for artistic development attended
by children and adults. Between the period of 1910 and 1914, Hellerau
became a cultural center for music, theatre, and dance.
In partnership with Adolphe Appia, a noted theatre designer,
Jaques-Dalcroze supervised the construction of a school and performance
space that was noted for its architectural and theatrical
innovations—instead of a proscenium, the space was now open,
which brought the audience closer in to the performances. In addition,
all components were completely modular, which allowed the performers to
move the stage in front of the audience (Spector, 1990). During
performances, students were not categorized as musicians, dancers, or
actors, but functioned as all three. In the summers of 1912 and 1913,
audiences flocked to Hellerau to see the student summer performance of
Gluck’s Orfeo ed Euridice. These demonstrations attracted notable
artists and teachers from around the world: theatre luminaries
Konstantin Stanislavsky and George Bernard Shaw; dancers Mary Wigman,
Sergei Diaghilev and Rudolf von Laban; and musician Darius Milhaud
(Martin, 1965).
With the outbreak of World War I, the Hellerau school was closed and a
permanent school was founded in Geneva. Jaques-Dalcroze, recognizing
the need for qualified instructors, designed a professional training
curriculum that enabled others to teach his approach. Instructors
continue to graduate in Dalcroze Eurhythmics from the Dalcroze School
in Geneva. These graduates have established training schools in many
cities around the globe (Dutoit, 1971). Jaques-Dalcroze continued
writing, composing, and teaching in Geneva until his death in 1950.
Besides his teaching philosophy, he is also remembered as a prolific
composer of songs, operettas, and large-scale festival presentations.
References
Abramson,
R. M.
(1980). Dalcroze-Based Improvisation. Music
Educators Journal.
January, 1980.
Caldwell, J. T. (1993).
A Dalcroze
perspective on skills for learning music. Music
Educators
Journal, 79(7),
27-28.
Caldwell, J. T. (1995).
Expressive
singing: Dalcroze eurhythmics
for voice. Englewood
Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice Hall.
Campbell, P. S. (1991). Rhythmic
movement and
public school education: progressive
views in
the formative
years. Journal of
Research in Music
Education, 19,
12-22.
Carder, P. (Ed.). (1990). The eclectic curriculum in
American music
education (2nd
ed.). Reston, VA: Music
Educators National Conference.
Collins,
D. L. (1993). Teaching
choral music. Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Dutoit, C. L. (1971). Music movement therapy.
Geneva,
Switzerland: Institut
Jaques-Dalcroze.
Jaques-Dalcroze, E. (1920). The Jaques-Dalcroze method of
eurhythmics:
rhythmic movement,
Vols. 1 and 2. London: Novello, 1920. (Orgininal work
published
in 1918)
Jaques-Dalcroze, E. (1921). Rhythm, music and education
(H. F.
Rubinstein, Trans.).
New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons. (Original
work
published in 1921).
Jaques-Dalcroze, E. (1931). Eurhythmics, art and education
(F.
Rothwell, Trans.; C.
Cox, Ed.). New York: Barnes. (Original
work
published in 1930).
Johnson, M. D. (1993). Dalcroze
skills for all
teachers. Music
Educators Journals, 79 (8), 42-45.
Martin, F., Dénes, T., Berchtold,
A.,
Gagnebin, H., Reichel, B., Dutoit, C., Stadler,
E. (1965). Émile
Jaques-Dalcroze:
L’homme, le compositeur, le créateur de la
rhythmique.
Neuchâtel, Swisse: Baconnière.
Mead, V. H. (1994). Dalcroze eurhythmics in today's
music
classroom. New York:
Schott Music Corporation.
Odom, S. L. (1998) Jaques-Dalcroze, Emile. International Encyclopedia of
Dance,
Vol. 3. New York: Oxford.
Pennington, J. (1925). The
importance of being rhythmic. New York: Knickerbocker
Press.
Spector, I. (1990). Rhythm
and life:
The work of Emile Jaques-Dalcroze. Stuyvesant,
NY: Pendragon Press.
Recommended
Additional Readings
and video
Aronoff, F. W. (1983). Dalcroze strategies for music learning in the
classroom. International
Journal of Music Education, 2,
23-25.
Bachmann, M. L. (1991). Dalcroze Today. An Education through and into
Music
(D.
Parlett, Trans.). New York: Oxford
University Press.
Dale, M. (2000). Eurhythmics
for
Young Children: Six Lessons for Fall. Ellicott City,
Maryland: MusiKinesis, 2000.
Driver, E. (1951). A
Pathway to
Dalcroze Eurhythmics. London: T. Nelson and Sons.
Findlay, E. (1971). Rhythm
and
Movement: Applications of Dalcroze Eurhythmics.
Secaucus, New Jersey: Summy Birchard,
1971.
Joseph, A. (1982). A
Dalcroze
Eurhythmics Approach to Music Learning in Kindergarten Through
Rhythmic Movement, Ear Training and Improvisation. Doctoral
dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.
Leck, H. & Frego, R. J. D. (2005). Creating Artistry Through
Movements.
(DVD).
Milwaukee, Hal Lenard #08744511. ISBN:
0634098381.
Moore, S. F. (1992). The Writings of Emile
Jaques-Dalcroze:
Toward a theory for the
performance
of musical rhythm. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana
University.
(University Micro-films International,
MI 48106).
David Frego, professor and Chair of
the Department of Music at the University of Texas at San Antonio,
received a G.M. from Brandon University in Canada, and an M.M., M.M.Ed.
and a Ph.D. from Florida State University. In 1998 he established the
Dalcroze Research Center in the Lawrence and Lee Theatre Research
Institute at The Ohio State University. He regularly presents workshops
in Dalcroze Eurhythmics throughout the globe. Dr. Frego is
past-president of the Dalcroze Society of America.
Videos:
David
Frego
Dalcroze lessons, clip 1:
Dalcroze lessons, clip 2: Videos
are
presented
in RealMedia format